Batomon Showdown companion
SearchRecorder

BatoForge observations // team meta · daily

Rattleghast + Toximoth

Inspect a Batomon Showdown combination's common full teams, supporting units and battle results by Run Day.

Check the rest of the team.

Look at the full-team examples, supporting units and results by Run Day. The core needs teammates that cover its missing damage, defense and support.

Forms and levels are unknown. Check each unit's triggers and directional targets before choosing upgrades; the observations do not reveal a purchase order.

Work through a formation example →
Period length
Window
Mode
Region
Return order

Completed period Oct 27 16:00 – Oct 28 16:00 UTCpartial

4,135,850 observations · all modes/regions · includes repeats · game version unknown

The selected Ranked / All period contains 970,642 distinct team votes;2,697 are grouped under this combination in Team Meta. Full teams and supporting units use that group. Trainer and rank details include all teams carrying these units, including teams in other groups.

Appearance share
0.28%
2,697 / 970,642 team votes in this mode and region
Day-battle win rate
52.1%
n=2,697 (1405W/1292L)
Avg observed Run Day
day 2.5
Average age of the recorded teams, not when this combination first formed.

Most-seen full teams

These examples use records from Day 4 onward; compositions also seen earlier are included. Counts group Batomon by species; forms and levels are unknown. Each example labels its positions as observed, estimated, or unavailable.

Common supporting units

Share of teams in this Team Meta group that carry each additional unit.

Lamplet27%Shellter16%Leafleap14%Beetbud10%

These details include all teams carrying this combination, including teams in other Team Meta groups. There are 15,449 carrying team votes in the selected mode, region and period. Position, Trainer and rank samples differ; each section lists its count.

Where the units sit

Positions 1–6 follow the displayed two-row, three-column board. Each percentage uses that unit's position samples, including repeated copies. These separate samples do not show which six positions occurred together.

Rattleghast16,359 position sightings
16%228%314%47%534%611%
Toximoth18,147 position sightings
119%214%316%421%513%617%

Trainers behind it

22 listed Trainers, covering 13,984 of 15,449 carrying team votes. Each win rate uses that Trainer's battles; n is its total wins and losses. 1,465 carrying team votes have no available Trainer detail.

Chemist63.0%2,805 team votes · n=2,805 (1,768W/1,037L)Painter44.9%1,333 team votes · n=1,333 (598W/735L)Lucky Girl51.7%1,121 team votes · n=1,121 (579W/542L)Treasure Hunter47.0%794 team votes · n=794 (373W/421L)Burglar49.3%669 team votes · n=669 (330W/339L)Twins44.3%662 team votes · n=662 (293W/369L)Gamer43.7%652 team votes · n=652 (285W/367L)Egg Breeder52.5%615 team votes · n=615 (323W/292L)Monster Ranger60.2%603 team votes · n=603 (363W/240L)Masked Man44.7%582 team votes · n=582 (260W/322L)Bug Catcher54.6%582 team votes · n=582 (318W/264L)Shopkeeper45.9%549 team votes · n=549 (252W/297L)Mad Scientist42.2%507 team votes · n=507 (214W/293L)Youngster52.6%447 team votes · n=447 (235W/212L)Scavenger48.3%393 team votes · n=393 (190W/203L)Black Belt43.5%331 team votes · n=331 (144W/187L)Smuggler48.6%313 team votes · n=313 (152W/161L)Rich Lady52.9%306 team votes · n=306 (162W/144L)Swim Coach65.7%265 team votes · n=265 (174W/91L)Chef46.8%171 team votes · n=171 (80W/91L)Gentleman39.1%156 team votes · n=156 (61W/95L)Redhead41.4%128 team votes · n=128 (53W/75L)

Ladder spread

Shares use the 15,449 team votes with a known rank. Each win rate uses that rank's battles.

bronze3.7%564 team votes · 63.5% won · n=564 (358W/206L)silver3.8%594 team votes · 58.2% won · n=594 (346W/248L)gold5.8%895 team votes · 58.0% won · n=895 (519W/376L)platinum8.7%1,337 team votes · 56.9% won · n=1,337 (761W/576L)diamond13.0%2,009 team votes · 51.9% won · n=2,009 (1,043W/966L)master65.1%10,050 team votes · 49.5% won · n=10,050 (4,971W/5,079L)

Master MMR bands

Percentages use all 10,050 Master team votes;10,050 have recorded MMR. Teams without MMR stay in "MMR unknown."

<1,000 MMR7.7%773 team votes · 48.5% won · n=773 (375W/398L)1,000–1,399 MMR5.1%515 team votes · 49.1% won · n=515 (253W/262L)1,400–1,799 MMR9.3%930 team votes · 48.8% won · n=930 (454W/476L)1,800–2,199 MMR14.7%1,473 team votes · 47.5% won · n=1,473 (699W/774L)2,200–2,599 MMR14.2%1,432 team votes · 51.0% won · n=1,432 (731W/701L)2,600–2,999 MMR21.1%2,117 team votes · 51.6% won · n=2,117 (1,093W/1,024L)3,000+ MMR28.0%2,810 team votes · 48.6% won · n=2,810 (1,366W/1,444L)

Presence and results by run day

The longest cyan bar marks the Run Day with the most recorded teams in this group. Other bars are scaled to that day. Each label shows that day's wins and losses; smaller samples also show a 95% confidence lower bound.

  1. Day 153.8%won
    n=769414W / 355L95% confidence lower bound 50.3%
  2. Day 253.1%won
    n=845449W / 396L95% confidence lower bound 49.8%
  3. Day 356.5%won
    n=499282W / 217L95% confidence lower bound 52.1%
  4. Day 446.8%won
    n=312146W / 166L95% confidence lower bound 41.3%
  5. Day 543.0%won
    n=15868W / 90L95% confidence lower bound 35.6%
  6. Day 642.2%won
    n=6427W / 37L95% confidence lower bound 30.9%
  7. Day 748.1%won
    n=2713W / 14L95% confidence lower bound 30.7%
  8. Day 837.5%won
    n=166W / 10L95% confidence lower bound 18.5%
  9. Day 90.0%won
    n=60W / 6L95% confidence lower bound 0.0%
  10. Day 100.0%won
    n=10W / 1L95% confidence lower bound 0.0%