Batomon Showdown companion
SearchRecorder

BatoForge observations // team meta · daily

Lamplet + Leafleap

Inspect a Batomon Showdown combination's common full teams, supporting units and battle results by Run Day.

Check the rest of the team.

Look at the full-team examples, supporting units and results by Run Day. The core needs teammates that cover its missing damage, defense and support.

Forms and levels are unknown. Check each unit's triggers and directional targets before choosing upgrades; the observations do not reveal a purchase order.

Work through a formation example →
Period length
Window
Mode
Region
Return order

Completed period Oct 27 16:00 – Oct 28 16:00 UTCpartial

4,135,850 observations · all modes/regions · includes repeats · game version unknown

The selected Ranked / All period contains 970,642 distinct team votes;2,418 are grouped under this combination in Team Meta. Full teams and supporting units use that group. Trainer and rank details include all teams carrying these units, including teams in other groups.

Appearance share
0.25%
2,418 / 970,642 team votes in this mode and region
Day-battle win rate
56.4%
n=2,418 (1363W/1055L)
Avg observed Run Day
day 3.3
Average age of the recorded teams, not when this combination first formed.

Most-seen full teams

These examples use records from Day 4 onward; compositions also seen earlier are included. Counts group Batomon by species; forms and levels are unknown. Each example labels its positions as observed, estimated, or unavailable.

Common supporting units

Share of teams in this Team Meta group that carry each additional unit.

Toximoth26%Bunchop22%Shogapede18%Beetbud18%

These details include all teams carrying this combination, including teams in other Team Meta groups. There are 10,552 carrying team votes in the selected mode, region and period. Position, Trainer and rank samples differ; each section lists its count.

Where the units sit

Positions 1–6 follow the displayed two-row, three-column board. Each percentage uses that unit's position samples, including repeated copies. These separate samples do not show which six positions occurred together.

Lamplet12,252 position sightings
116%217%314%413%519%623%
Leafleap12,331 position sightings
119%213%312%425%518%613%

Trainers behind it

22 listed Trainers, covering 9,656 of 10,552 carrying team votes. Each win rate uses that Trainer's battles; n is its total wins and losses. 896 carrying team votes have no available Trainer detail.

Lucky Girl60.7%899 team votes · n=899 (546W/353L)Bug Catcher63.0%816 team votes · n=816 (514W/302L)Painter58.8%787 team votes · n=787 (463W/324L)Treasure Hunter57.0%723 team votes · n=723 (412W/311L)Redhead65.6%567 team votes · n=567 (372W/195L)Burglar57.9%553 team votes · n=553 (320W/233L)Twins56.6%493 team votes · n=493 (279W/214L)Gamer55.1%439 team votes · n=439 (242W/197L)Shopkeeper56.6%419 team votes · n=419 (237W/182L)Black Belt55.6%401 team votes · n=401 (223W/178L)Egg Breeder55.4%381 team votes · n=381 (211W/170L)Mad Scientist50.5%376 team votes · n=376 (190W/186L)Masked Man50.9%373 team votes · n=373 (190W/183L)Scavenger60.2%352 team votes · n=352 (212W/140L)Monster Ranger67.3%346 team votes · n=346 (233W/113L)Chemist73.2%284 team votes · n=284 (208W/76L)Chef74.5%278 team votes · n=278 (207W/71L)Swim Coach73.8%275 team votes · n=275 (203W/72L)Youngster55.3%244 team votes · n=244 (135W/109L)Smuggler58.6%237 team votes · n=237 (139W/98L)Rich Lady60.7%211 team votes · n=211 (128W/83L)Gentleman53.5%202 team votes · n=202 (108W/94L)

Ladder spread

Shares use the 10,552 team votes with a known rank. Each win rate uses that rank's battles.

bronze2.9%301 team votes · 68.8% won · n=301 (207W/94L)silver4.5%472 team votes · 69.9% won · n=472 (330W/142L)gold5.1%538 team votes · 63.2% won · n=538 (340W/198L)platinum7.1%748 team votes · 58.2% won · n=748 (435W/313L)diamond12.3%1,299 team votes · 61.2% won · n=1,299 (795W/504L)master68.2%7,194 team votes · 59.1% won · n=7,194 (4,250W/2,944L)

Master MMR bands

Percentages use all 7,194 Master team votes;7,194 have recorded MMR. Teams without MMR stay in "MMR unknown."

<1,000 MMR8.8%634 team votes · 61.2% won · n=634 (388W/246L)1,000–1,399 MMR4.6%328 team votes · 61.9% won · n=328 (203W/125L)1,400–1,799 MMR9.6%690 team votes · 61.0% won · n=690 (421W/269L)1,800–2,199 MMR13.3%958 team votes · 57.3% won · n=958 (549W/409L)2,200–2,599 MMR14.0%1,009 team votes · 57.6% won · n=1,009 (581W/428L)2,600–2,999 MMR19.8%1,425 team votes · 59.7% won · n=1,425 (851W/574L)3,000+ MMR29.9%2,150 team votes · 58.5% won · n=2,150 (1,257W/893L)

Presence and results by run day

The longest cyan bar marks the Run Day with the most recorded teams in this group. Other bars are scaled to that day. Each label shows that day's wins and losses; smaller samples also show a 95% confidence lower bound.

  1. Day 154.3%won
    n=593322W / 271L95% confidence lower bound 50.3%
  2. Day 258.6%won
    n=556326W / 230L95% confidence lower bound 54.5%
  3. Day 362.4%won
    n=370231W / 139L95% confidence lower bound 57.4%
  4. Day 461.5%won
    n=314193W / 121L95% confidence lower bound 56.0%
  5. Day 558.9%won
    n=219129W / 90L95% confidence lower bound 52.3%
  6. Day 648.9%won
    n=13566W / 69L95% confidence lower bound 40.6%
  7. Day 749.0%won
    n=9647W / 49L95% confidence lower bound 39.2%
  8. Day 846.8%won
    n=6229W / 33L95% confidence lower bound 34.9%
  9. Day 932.3%won
    n=3110W / 21L95% confidence lower bound 18.6%
  10. Day 1015.8%won
    n=193W / 16L95% confidence lower bound 5.5%
  11. Day 1127.3%won
    n=113W / 8L95% confidence lower bound 9.7%
  12. Day 1228.6%won
    n=72W / 5L95% confidence lower bound 8.2%
  13. Day 1366.7%won
    n=32W / 1L95% confidence lower bound 20.8%
  14. Day 140.0%won
    n=20W / 2L95% confidence lower bound 0.0%